Profil des dépenses

Ce diagramme montre les dépenses réelles et les dépenses prévues de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada en millions de dollars.

Exercice 2009-2010

• Dépenses totales 3312 $

Exercice 2010-2011

• Dépenses totales 3107 $

Exercice 2011-2012

• Dépenses totales 2975 $
• Dépenses totales ajustées 2975 $

Exercice 2012-2013

• Dépenses totales 3124 $
• Dépenses totales ajustées 2794 $

Exercice 2013-2014

• Dépenses totales 2853 $
• Dépenses totales ajustées 2853 $
• Dépenses totales et programmes temporarisés 2858 $

Exercice 2014-2015

• Dépenses totales 2737 $
• Dépenses totales et programmes temporarisés 2746 $

Exercice 2015-2016

• Dépenses totales 2757 $
• Dépenses totales et programmes temporarisés 2770 $

Retour à la page du Rapport ministériel

Distribution des charges

Ce diagramme montre la répartition des dépenses de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada, exprimées en pourcentages.

• Opérations policières 80,1 %
• Services internes 9,8 %
• Service canadiens d'application de la loi 6,0 %
• Opérations policières internationales 1,3 %
• Culture et patrimoine de la police canadienne 0,3 %
• Paiements législatifs 2,5 %

Retour à la page du Rapport ministériel

Distribution des revenus

Ce diagramme montre la répartition des recettes de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada, exprimées en pourcentages.

• Services policiers 99,7 %
• Autres activités 0,3 %

Retour à la page du Rapport ministériel

Les passifs par catégories

Ce diagramme montre les éléments de passif de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada, selon le type, exprimés en pourcentages.

• Compte de pension des membres de la GRC 93,5 %
• Comptes fournisseurs et charges à payer 2,7 %
• Paye de vacances et congés compensatoires 1,8 %
• Avantages futurs des employés 1,7 %
• Revenu reporté net 0,1 %
• Obligations locatives pour les immobilisations corporelles 0,1 %
• Autres éléments de passif 0,1 %

Retour à la page du Rapport ministériel

Les actifs par catégories

Ce diagramme montre les éléments d'actif de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada, selon le type, exprimés en pourcentages.

• Montant à recevoir du Trésor 86,5 %
• Valeur nette des comptes clients et des avances 4,2 %
• Immobilisations corporelles 8,9 %
• Stocks 0,4 %

Retour à la page du Rapport ministériel

User Fees and Regulatory Charges (User Fees Act)

Business Licences

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Firearms Fees Regulations

Year last modified: 2005

Performance standards: 55 days

Performance results: 73.8% of properly completed business licence applications were completed within 55 days

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
300.0	137.4 Footnote 1	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	150.0	Other Information Footnote 2
			2014-15	150.0
			2015-16	150.0

Other information:

• Most business licences are renewed on a three-year cycle, except for ammunition only business licences that are renewed on a five-year cycle.
• The variance between the 2012-13 Forecasted revenue and the 2012-13 Actual revenue is due to lower than anticipated requests for business licences and renewals in 2012-13.
• The approximately 10 percent decrease in performance results in 2012-13, compared to 2011-12, is attributable to an increase in workload resulting from a higher volume of business licence applications in 2012-13 as a direct result of the expiration of the fee waiver and client inquires related to Bill C-19: Ending the Long-gun Registry Act legislative changes.

Individual Licences

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Firearms Fees Regulations

Year last modified: 1988

Performance standards: 45 days

Performance results: 93.9% of properly completed individual licence applications were completed within 45 days

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
15,629.8	9,394.2 Footnote 1	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	19,500.0	Other Information Footnote 2
			2014-15	19,500.0
			2015-16	19,500.0

Other information:

• The shortfall in Actual revenue collected versus Forecasted revenue is due to the fee waiver applicable to restricted firearm licences that was in effect until September 16, 2012 and non-restricted firearm licences that was in effect until May 16, 2013.
• It is anticipated that in 2013-14 and onwards, revenues will increase significantly with the expiration of the fee waiver.
• See Individual Licences ^{Footnote 3} for additional information.

Authorizations

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Firearms Fees Regulations

Year last modified: 1998

Performance standards: 30 days

Performance results: 99.4% of properly completed Authorizations to Carry (ATC) applications were completed within 30 days

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
315.0	264.8 Footnote 1	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	300.0	Other Information Footnote 2
			2014-15	300.0
			2015-16	300.0

Non-resident permits

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Firearms Fees Regulations

Year last modified: 2005

Performance standards: 100% of all requests for non-resident permits are fulfilled for eligible applicants by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), as per S.35(1)(a)(ii) and S.35(1)(b) of the Firearms Act

Performance results: CBSA fulfilled 48,051 requests for non-resident firearms declarations

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
1,300.0	1,256.3	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	1,300.0	Other Information Footnote 2
			2014-15	1,300.0
			2015-16	1,300.0

Other information: The information presented is collected by CBSA, as it issues Non-resident permits on behalf of the RCMP.

Services for replacement of documents

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Firearms Fees Regulations

Year last modified: 2005

Performance standards: 25 days

Performance results: 96.5% of applications for replacement documents were completed within 25 days

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
113.0	143.9 Footnote 4	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	125.0	Other Information Footnote 2
			2014-15	125.0
			2015-16	125.0

RCMP - Access to Information and Privacy Branch (ATIP)

Fee type: Regulatory

Fee-setting authority: Access to Information Act and Regulations

Year last modified: 1982

Performance standards: Government institution must respond to all formal Access to Information Act requests within the legislated time frame as defined under the Act.

Performance results: Last fiscal year, the RCMP processed 36.6% of all Access to Information Act requests received within the legislated time frame.

2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
7.0	5.6	915.0	2013-14	6.0	1,316.0
			2014-15	6.0	1,316.0
			2015-16	6.0	1,316.0

Other information: There continues to be a decrease in compliance rates in 2012-13. While the number of requests dropped by approximately four percent as compared to 2011-12, the low rate of compliance is attributable to two factors: a reduction in the number of ATIP-dedicated resources and an increase in the complexity of the requests. There was a 384 percent increase in the number of pages reviewed under the Access to Information Act and a 69 percent increase in the number of pages reviewed under the Privacy Act.

Moving forward, the ATIP Branch will be implementing a strategy to increase ATIP-dedicated resources in 2013-14 in order to improve the compliance rate to 80 percent within two years. The two-year timeframe will allow for a reduction in the backlog of requests and accounts for the time required to fill vacancies and provide the necessary training to new staff.

User Fees Total

	2012-13 ($thousands)			Planning years ($thousands)
	Forecast revenue	Actual revenue	Full cost	Fiscal year	Forecast revenue	Estimated full cost
Subtotal Regulatory	17,664.8	11,202.2	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2
				2014-15	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2
				2015-16	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2
Subtotal Other Products and Services				2013-14
				2014-15
				2015-16
Total	17,664.8	11,202.2	Other Information Footnote 2	2013-14	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2
				2014-15	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2
				2015-16	21,381.0	Other Information Footnote 2

External Fees (Policy on Service Standards for External Fees)

External fee	Service standard	Performance results	Stakeholder consultation
Business Licences	Properly completed business licence applications are processed within 55 days.	The service standard was met 73.8% of the time.	Quarterly performance results for business firearms licences were tracked through the Canadian Firearms Program's internal performance management framework. Performance results were reported quarterly to Canadian Firearms Program management and Chief Firearms Officers. Regular reviews and stakeholder consultations were not conducted as fees for business licences are established through an Order in Council and prescribed as per the Firearms Fees Regulations.
Individual Licences	Properly completed individual licence applications are processed within 45 days.	The service standard was met 93.9% of the time.	Quarterly performance results for individual firearms licences were tracked through the Canadian Firearms Program's internal performance management framework. Performance results were reported quarterly to Canadian Firearms Program management and Chief Firearms Officers. Regular reviews and stakeholder consultations were not conducted as fees for individual licences are established through an Order in Council and prescribed as per the Firearms Fees Regulations.
Authorizations	Properly completed Authorization to Carry (ATC) applications are processed within 30 days.	The service standard was met 99.4% of the time.	Quarterly performance results for firearms authorizations were tracked through the Canadian Firearms Program's internal performance management framework. Performance results were reported quarterly to Canadian Firearms Program management and Chief Firearms Officers. Regular reviews and stakeholder consultations were not conducted as fees for authorizations are established through an Order in Council and prescribed as per the Firearms Fees Regulations.
Non-resident permits	Non-resident permits are issued to all eligible individuals. Canada Border Services Agency collected information on non-resident permits as required as per S.35(1)(a)(ii) and S.35(1)(b) of the Firearms Act.	Non-resident permits are issued to 100% of all eligible individuals. Canada Border Services Agency collected information on non-resident permits as required as per S.35(1)(a)(ii) and S.35(1)(b) of the Firearms Act.	Canada Border Services Agency collected information on non-resident permits on behalf of the RCMP. Regular reviews and stakeholder consultations were not conducted by the Canadian Firearms Program as fees for non-resident permits are established through an Order in Council and prescribed as per the Firearms Fees Regulations.
Services for replacements of documents	Properly completed applications for replacement documents are processed within 25 days.	The service standard was met 96.5% of the time.	Quarterly performance results for replacement of documents were tracked through the Canadian Firearms Program's internal performance management framework. Performance results were reported and reviewed quarterly by the Canadian Firearms Program. Consultations with stakeholders were not conducted.

Other information: N/A

Project	Original estimated Total cost ($millions)	Revised estimated Total cost ($millions)	Actual cost total ($millions)	Main Estimates 2012-13 ($millions)	Planned spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Total Authorities 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected date of close-out
Police Operations
Radio Modernization - Newfoundland	25.4	14.6	17.3	0.0	0.0	12.0	0.0	2013-14
Emergency Response Team Level 1 Tactical Armoured Vehicle (Pre-PPA)	13.6	12.4	12.4	1.8	1.8	1.8	1.8	2012-13
West Coast Marine Patrol Vessels (EPA)	48.9	0.0	0.0	15.0	0.0	15.0	0.0	2012-13
Canadian Law Enforcement Services
Real Time Identification (RTID)	124.0	139.2	133.0	13.9	11.2	18.8	11.2	2012-13
Temporary Residents Biometrics Project	22.9	29.0	20.8	10.2	10.2	11.6	9.4	2013-14
Internal Services
Alberta - Detachment - Grande Cache (EPA)	7.1	5.2	3.0	3.3	3.3	3.3	2.4	2013-14
Alberta - Detachment - High Level (PPA)	11.7	8.7	6.3	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.1	2013-14
British Columbia - E Division HQ (P3) (EPA) Footnote 5	38.8	36.4	31.8	13.8	13.8	13.8	10.9	2013-14
British Columbia - Detachment - 100 Mile House (PPA)	10.9	9.0	0.8	3.1	0.0	3.1	0.0	2015-16
British Columbia - Detachment - Golden (EPA)	12.1	6.4	6.3	1.8	1.8	1.8	1.7	2012-13
Newfoundland - Detachment - Springdale (EPA)	7.6	5.9	5.9	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2012-13
North West Territories - Detachment - Inuvik (PPA)	16.0	18.8	1.3	0.9	0.9	0.9	0.7	2016-17
Nova Scotia - H Division HQ Replacement (EPA) Footnote 5	24.5	10.0	8.2	5.0	5.0	5.0	4.8	2013-14
Nova Scotia - Detachment - Ingonish (PPA)	7.4	5.4	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2015-16
Ontario - Ottawa - NCA, L.H. Nicholson HQ Replacement (73 Leikin) (EPA) Footnote 5	44.5	40.9	41.3	2.3	3.3	3.3	2.2	2012-13
Ontario - Ottawa - TPOF - Armoury Expansion (PPA)	4.7	5.7	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.3	2015-16
Saskatchewan - Regina, Depot - Electrical Distribution Network Replacement (EPA)	24.4	21.7	21.8	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	2013-14
Saskatchewan - Regina, Depot Permanent Dormitory (EPA for Phase 1 and 2)	86.5	84.5	64.6	18.7	24.3	38.2	17.5	2015-16
Pilatus Replacement Program (EPA)	33.8	65.2	48.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2014-15

Respendable Revenue

Program	Actual 2010-11 ($millions)	Actual 2011-12 ($millions)	Main Estimates 2012-13 ($millions)	Planned Revenue 2012-13 ($millions)	Total Authorities 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual 2012-13 ($millions)
Police Operations
Contracted Policing Services	1,569.1	1,659.1	1,490.7 Footnote 1	1,773.7	1,715.8	1,719.3
Subtotal	1,569.1	1,659.1	1,490.7	1,773.7	1,715.8	1,719.3
Canadian Law Enforcement Services
Canadian Police College	6.7	5.7	5.5	5.5	5.5	7.9
Subtotal	6.7	5.7	5.5	5.5	5.5	7.9
Internal Services
Recovery of Pension Administration Costs	15.0	21.9	38.2	38.2	39.1	29.7
Subtotal	15.0	21.9	38.2	38.2	39.1	29.7
Total Respendable Revenue	1,590.8	1,686.7	1,534.4	1,817.4	1,760.4	1,756.9

Non-Respendable Revenue

Program	Actual 2010-11 ($millions)	Actual 2011-12 ($millions)	Planned Revenue 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual 2012-13 ($millions)
Police Operations
Licences and Permits	0.4	0.0	0.5	0.2
Employment Benefit Plan Cost Recoveries	83.5	88.3	93.1	168.1 Footnote 2
Canadian Law Enforcement Services
DNA Revenues	2.9	4.7	3.2	3.8
Proceeds from Sales	10.6	11.5	11.6	14.0
Internal Services
Interest Revenue	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1
Proceeds from Sales Footnote 3	1.1	1.0	1.1	1.0
Miscellaneous	0.5	0.6	0.6	1.7
Rental of Public Property	9.8	10.1	10.8	10.4
Total Non-Respendable Revenue	108.9	116.3	121.0	199.3

Response to parliamentary committees

Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (March 2013, 41st Parliament, 1st Session)

On February 28, 2013, the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration adopted its Seventh Report, Standing On Guard For Thee: Ensuring That Canada's Immigration System Is Secure. The report was presented to the House of Commons on March 18, 2013. The House of Commons requested a government response, which was tabled on June 17, 2013.

Following the Committee recommendations, the following work related to the RCMP has been undertaken:

1. The Government of Canada has taken significant measures to secure federal systems and networks including the stringent security protection of databases to withstand potential cyber attacks. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC), the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Shared Services Canada are working in close consultation to ensure that technological safeguards are in place to secure the systems that have been developed to collect, use and store biometric information. Digital fingerprints will be securely transmitted to the RCMP for fingerprint matching and storage, where strict security and privacy protection safeguards for biometric information are employed.
2. The Government supports effective and responsible information sharing among federal partners in accordance with existing laws and authorities, and continues to build on collaborative efforts over the last several years to enhance this essential component of public safety and national security. Existing information sharing arrangements between CIC, the CBSA, the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) continue to be reviewed to ensure that they serve the current needs of the security screening program that forms part of Canada's immigration process.
3. The Government is committed to continuing to work closely with allies to ensure that all sensitive intelligence or other information is effectively shared and protected, according to lawful authorities, international obligations and privacy laws. In 2011, the Minister of Public Safety issued Ministerial Directions on "Information Sharing with Foreign Entities" to CSIS, the RCMP and the CBSA to establish consistent policy on decision making processes regarding information sharing where there may be a risk of mistreatment.
4. The Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Program provides a comprehensive response for dealing with persons suspected of committing war crimes and who are attempting to enter, or have entered, Canada. In some cases, a criminal justice response is the most appropriate action, for which the RCMP launches criminal investigations pursuant to the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

For more information, please visit:

Committee Report Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration

Government Response Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration

Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology (March 2013, 41st Parliament, 1st Session)

On February 26, 2013, the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology adopted its third Report entitled Intellectual Property Regime In Canada. The report was presented to the House of Commons on March 18, 2013. The House of Commons requested a government response, which was tabled in the House on June 17, 2013.

Following the Committee recommendations, the following progress and corrective actions related to the RCMP were undertaken:

1. Regarding the recommendation to the effect that the Government of Canada [should] ensure that appropriate authority be vested in the RCMP and border officials to do their work, while ensuring respect for civil liberties and due process, it was noted that Bill C-56 (Combating Counterfeit Products Act) would provide the necessary authorities for the RCMP and customs officials to effectively identify counterfeit and pirated goods. The Bill would make it a criminal offence to knowingly sell, manufacture, cause to manufacture, import, export, attempt to export and possess for the purpose of sale or distribution counterfeit goods and labels on a commercial scale. It also adds the acts of exporting, attempting to export and possessing for sale or rental of pirated goods to the current criminal offences in the Copyright Act. These offences target commercial activity but do not apply to individuals who acquire or use counterfeit or pirated goods for their personal use.
2. In response to the recommendation to the effect "that the Government of Canada include consumer groups in addition to industry groups in education and coordination efforts to combat piracy and counterfeit";, it was noted that consumer groups will be invited to join the existing Intellectual Property (IP) Crime Working Group coordinated by the Canadian Anti-Counterfeiting Network (CACN) and the RCMP. This Working Group was formed jointly by the RCMP, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and CACN as a platform for private sector and federal departments to work together in support of IP enforcement. The IP Crime Working Group is currently comprised of federal departments and agencies (RCMP, CBSA, Industry Canada, Health Canada and the Department of Justice) and private sector representatives (CACN, Canadian Chamber of Commerce, Canadian Bar Association, Canadian Recording Industry Association and the IP Institute of Canada). Having consumer groups participate in the Working Group will contribute to a more balanced approach to combating counterfeiting and piracy.

For more information, please visit:

• Committee Report Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology
• Government Response Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology

Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)

Audit of the Administration of the House of Commons ^{Footnote 1} and Audit of the Administration of the Senate ^{Footnote 2}

In 2012-13, the Auditor General tabled two audits which examined five areas of House of Commons and Senate Administration including security of the Parliamentary Precinct. The reports were tabled to the Standing Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration (Senate) and the Board of Internal Economy (House of Commons) in April 2012.

Security Services responds to the security risks and balances public access with the need to provide a safe and secure environment for Members, staff and visitors. There are three parties that are responsible for security on Parliament Hill: the RCMP is responsible for the grounds, and the House of Commons Security Services and Senate Protective Services are responsible for security inside the buildings. Coordination among the three agencies is maximized through the jointly staffed Master Security Plan Office.

The recommendations were addressed to either the Senate or House of Commons Administration. The RCMP was considered a third party in this audit. The audit found the coordination and communications between the three parties responsible for security have improved in recent years. This is due, in large part, to the development of a Master Security Plan by the three forces that allows operations to be coordinated through a jointly staffed office.

Audit of the Protection of Canada's Infrastructure from Cyber Threats ^{Footnote 3}

In 2012-13, the Auditor General tabled an audit in which the objective was to determine whether selected federal departments and agencies are helping to secure Canada's critical infrastructure from cyber threats by leading and coordinating activities in partnership with provinces, territories and the private sector. Critical infrastructure consists of physical and information technology assets such as the electricity distribution networks, telecommunications networks, banking systems, manufacturing and transportation systems, as well as government information systems and services that support the continued and effective functioning of government. The audit found that since 2010, with the announcement of the Cyber Security Strategy and of the National Strategy and Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure, the government has made progress in securing its systems against cyber threats.

Although the audit included the activities of the RCMP as a federal department involved in securing the critical infrastructure, the RCMP is only referenced in the report and has no recommendations addressed to them. Recommendations are directed to Public Safety and Treasury Board of Canada.

External audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

None.

Description

The Real Time Identification (RTID) Project was designed to facilitate the timely and efficient exchange of criminal records and fingerprint information and is a re-engineering of systems and business processes used for fingerprint identification, civil clearances and criminal records maintenance. It will transform the current paper-based workflow to an electronic workflow, enabling the "real time" identification of fingerprints submitted electronically.

Fingerprints are submitted by police agencies to support the creation of a criminal record or to search the criminal record repository during a criminal investigation or civil security screening. RTID will streamline these services, facilitate information sharing internationally, and permit an improved tracking of criminals by condensing identification turnaround times from weeks and months to hours and days.

The original RTID business case was approved as part of the Preliminary Project Approval (PPA) submitted in December 2004. Treasury Board Effective Project Approval (EPA) for Phase 1 dated October 2005 and EPA for Phase 2 dated June 2007 were both granted. Funding for the RTID Project was announced on April 20, 2004, under the National Security Policy. The Effective Project Approval (EPA) was amended in March 2011 in order to re-establish the approval authority and realign the project scope.

The Project was established under the sponsorship of National Police Services. The Chief Information Officer was appointed Project Leader, responsible for achieving the technology improvements associated with the project. The business owner is the Assistant Commissioner, Forensic Science and Identification Services. From a project governance perspective, the RTID Project Director reports to both the Chief Information Officer and the Assistant Commissioner, Forensic Science and Identification Services.

Project Phase

The Project is being delivered in two major Phases. RTID Phase 1 modernized the civil clearance process by replacing the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and implementing a new transaction manager, permitting agencies to submit their fingerprint information electronically. Phase 1 was closed from an Information Technology perspective in September 2008.

The scope of RTID Phase 2 has been amended based on recommendations made by an Independent Review conducted in 2010. Project work refined and developed the foundational systems and functionality aligned to the Phase 1 scope. The project closed out in March 2013.

Leading and Participating Departments and Agencies

Sponsoring Department	Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Contracting Authority	Public Works and Government Services Canada
Participating Departments	Public Safety Canada Citizenship and Immigration Canada Correctional Services Canada Canada Border Services Agency Transport Canada Federal Bureau of Investigation Provincial and Municipal Police Agencies

Prime and Major Subcontractors

Major subcontractors	Fujitsu Consulting (Canada) Inc. 600-360 Albert Street Ottawa ON K1R 7X7
	ADGA Group 600-616 Albert Street Ottawa ON K1P 5G3
	Cogent Systems, Inc. 639 North Rosemead Blvd. Pasadena CA 91107, USA

Major milestones

Major milestone	Date
Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and infrastructure to permit electronic fingerprint processing in production	March 2007
Electronic fingerprint processes for civil purposes implemented	March 2007
Contract for Criminal Record Workflow Component of RTID System (Phase 2) awarded	February 2008
Electronic processing of latent (crime scene) fingerprints implemented	March 2008
Vulnerable Sector functionality implemented	October 2010
EPA Approval	March 2011
Electronic fingerprint processes for criminal purposes implemented	May 2012
Palm and ID Flat search processes implemented	February 2013

Project Outcomes

The RTID Project aligns to the RCMP strategic outcome of "criminal activity affecting Canadians is reduced" and supports Forensic Science & Identification Services, Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services expected outcome "to maintain the national repository of criminal record and fingerprint information".

RTID Project Service Level Agreements

Service	2001	RTID
Fingerprint verification, civil 10-print searched (not linked to a criminal record)	5 months	3 business days
Fingerprint verification, latent (crime scene) searches	6 weeks	24 hours
Fingerprint verification, refugee 10-print searches	6 weeks	2 hours
Fingerprint verification, criminal 10-print searches	10 weeks	2 hours
Fingerprint verification, civil 10-print (linked to a criminal record)	6 weeks	3 business days

Progress Report and Explanations of Variances

The RTID Project has completed successfully meeting the EPA requirements, delivered on time and under budget.

Industrial Benefits

There are no industrial benefits of the Real Time Identification Project.

Internal Audits (current reporting period)

Name of Internal Audit	Internal Audit Type	Status	Completion Date
RCMP Findings related to the Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) Horizontal Audit of Electronic Record-Keeping	Horizontal Assurance Engagement	Completed	April 2012
Audit of CPIC Information	Assurance Engagement (Information Management)	Completed	April 2012
Audit of Human Resources Personnel Data	Assurance Engagement (Information Management)	Completed	July 2012
Audit of Intelligence Coordination and Sharing	Assurance Engagement (Operations)	Completed	July 2012
Audit of Business Continuity Planning	Assurance Engagement (Internal Services)	Completed	September 2012
Audit of Sensitive Expenditures 2011-12	Assurance Engagement - Treasury Board Requirement (Operations)	Completed	September 2012
Audit of the Destruction of Electronic Records Pertaining to Ending the Long Gun Registry	Tasking from PCO (Operations)	Completed	January 2013
RCMP Findings related to OCG Horizontal Audit on the Policy on Management, Resources, and Results Structures (MRRS)	Horizontal Assurance Engagement	In progress	April 2013
Audit of Exhibit Control at Detachments	Assurance Engagement (Operations)	In progress	September 2013 (estimated)
IT General Controls	Assurance Engagement (Internal Services)	In progress	August 2013 (estimated)
Selected Monitoring and Oversight Activities	Assurance Engagement (Internal Services)	In progress	September 2013 (estimated)
Long Term Sick Leave (formerly known as Audit of Workforce Management - Return to Work and Reassignment)	Assurance Engagement (Human Resources)	In progress	September 2013 (estimated)
Follow-up Audit of Operational Communications Centres	Assurance Engagement (Operations)	In progress	September 2013 (estimated)

Evaluations (current reporting period)

Name of Evaluation	Program	Status	Completion Date
Pilot Project CONCEPT (horizontal initiative led by the RCMP)	Police Operations - Border Integrity	Completed	July 2012
Community Safety Officer Program	Police Operations - Provincial/Territorial Policing	Completed	July 2012
Vancouver 2010 Games Security and Public Safety (horizontal initiative led by the RCMP)	Police Operations - Major Events	Completed	October 2012
National Counterfeit Enforcement Strategy (horizontal initiative led by the RCMP)	Police Operations - Financial Crime	Completed	October 2012
Gender-Based Assessment	Tasking by RCMP Commissioner - Human Resource Management	Completed	November 2012
G8/G20 Ontario Summits (horizontal initiative led by the RCMP)	Police Operations - Major Events	Pending Approval	August 2013 (Estimated)
Federal Contaminated Sites (horizontal initiative led by Environment Canada)	Asset Management - Internal Services	In progress	August 2013 (Estimated)
Measures to Address Contraband Tobacco (horizontal initiative led by Public Safety)	Police Operations- Federal Crime Enforcement	In progress	September 2013 (Estimated)
Great Lakes Marine Security Operations Centre (GLMSOC) (horizontal initiative led by RCMP)	Police Operations - Border Integrity	In progress	October 2013 (Estimated)
Flight Operations	Police Operations - Technical Services and Operational Support	In progress	December 2013 (Estimated)

Name of Horizontal Initiative: Investments to Combat the Criminal Use of Firearms (ICCUF)

Name of Lead Department: Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

Lead Department PAA Program: Canadian Firearms Program (CFP)

Start Date: May 2004

End Date: Ongoing

Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): Originally $49.9 million over five years; now $10.9 million per year, ongoing.

Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement):

The overall aim of the ICCUF is to improve the national collection, analysis and sharing of firearms-related intelligence and information. Funding is distributed within the RCMP to several sub-programs within the Canadian Law Enforcement Services program: Canadian Firearms Program (CFP), Criminal Intelligence (CI), Integrated Forensic Identification Services (IFIS) - Canadian Integrated Ballistics Information Network (CIBIN) laboratories, and the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC). The initiative also provides funds to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Public Safety Canada (PSC).

The ICCUF directly supports the Government's objective to tackle violent crime (especially firearms-related offences in relation to organized crime and street gangs).

Shared Outcomes: Enhanced RCMP and CBSA capacity to gather, analyze and share criminal intelligence in order to improve firearms investigations, and to increase knowledge of the extent and patterns of smuggling and trafficking of firearms used in crime. These contribute to Canada's intelligence-led national enforcement strategy.

Governance Structures: A Joint Management Team (JMT) coordinates ICCUF efforts. All partners participate in JMT meetings.

Performance Highlights:

Aligned with the Government of Canada's objective to tackle violent crime, particularly firearms-related offences, the ICCUF horizontal initiative continues to support the national collection, analysis, development and sharing of firearms-related intelligence with its federal partners.

This initiative also supports the fulfillment of firearms trace requests and the maintenance and distribution of the RCMP's firearms reference table to law enforcement. ICCUF also provides training to both Canadian and international law enforcement partners and enables the continued operation of the Canadian Integrated Ballistics Information Network (CIBIN).

In addition, it has allowed federal partners to provide policy advice related to crime guns to the Minister of Public Safety Canada, conduct relevant research, and continues to support illegal firearms seizures at Canadian ports of entry.

Public Safety Canada

Law Enforcement and Policing Branch

Contributing activities/programs	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) ($millions)	Planned Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected Results 2012-13	Contributing activity/program results 2012-13
ICCUF	Ongoing	$0.275	$0.272	Provide independent policy advice to the Minister of Public Safety on firearms and crime, and support research on such areas as the relationship between crime guns, street gangs, youth and organized crime	Provided ongoing policy advice to the Minister and undertook a project on international best practices

Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Canadian Firearms Program - Firearms Investigative and Enforcement Services (CCFP/FIES)

Contributing activities/programs	Total Allocation from Start to End Date) ($millions)	Planned Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected Results 2012-13	Contributing activity/program results 2012-13
ICCUF	Ongoing	$7.7 Footnote 1	$9.256	Provide enhanced and collaborative criminal firearms intelligence, close national firearm policy and operational gaps with partners, and meet present and future intelligence challenges Reduce the impact of serious firearms-related crime through continued support to law enforcement agencies, by providing specialized assistance to effectively investigate, gather and share criminal intelligence to successfully prosecute individuals involved in the illegal movement and criminal use of firearms	The recent acquisition of a national computer server within the CFP/FIES directorate has improved the collection, reporting and analysis of firearms data. The CFP/FIES hosted the 10th annual International Firearms Trafficking School in Ottawa. This school is dedicated to sharing firearms-related investigation information with law enforcement participants from many G20 countries. In addition, CFP/ FIES have delivered requested training on firearms identification in Trinidad, and specialized training through the INTERPOL Capacity Building Programme in the Dominican Republic, increasing the number of officers qualified to investigate firearms trafficking crimes. The CFP/FIES fulfilled 2,639 tracing requests in 2012-13 and 4,900 requests for service for firearms investigations from law enforcement. In 2012-13, the CFP/FIES developed and released the Seized Firearms Safety training course, via the Canadian Police Knowledge Network (CPKN), and provided 98 training sessions to law enforcement during the year. The CFP/FIES supported the development of an INTERPOL Firearms Reference Table (IFRT) and have distributed via DVD a total of 2,400 copies of the FRT to law enforcement in Canada and Internationally.

Criminal Intelligence Program (CI)

Contributing activities/programs	Total Allocation from Start to End Date) ($millions)	Planned Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected Results 2012-13	Contributing activity/program results 2012-13
ICCUF	Ongoing	$1.12	$1.379	Provide enhanced and collaborative criminal firearms intelligence, close national firearm policy and operational gaps with partners, and meet present and future intelligence challenges Reduce the impact of serious firearms-related crime through continued support to law enforcement agencies, by providing specialized assistance to effectively investigate, gather and share criminal intelligence to successfully prosecute individuals involved in the illegal movement and criminal use of firearms	Criminal intelligence (CI) has supported frontline policing by providing actionable intelligence. Their efforts have identified and led to the arrest of suspects involved in firearms crimes. CI also wrote and shared intelligence briefs alerting law enforcement agencies of new trends. CI continues to contribute to the National Firearms Threat Assessment written by CISC. Source development remains a priority for the unit and it has been successful in achieving this goal.

Integrated Forensic Identification Services

Contributing activities/programs	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) ($millions)	Planned Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected Results 2012-13	Contributing activity/program results 2012-13
ICCUF	Ongoing	$0.948	$0.775	Provide enhanced and collaborative criminal firearms intelligence, close national firearm policy and operational gaps with partners, and meet present and future intelligence challenges Reduce the impact of serious firearms-related crime through continued support to law enforcement agencies, by providing specialized assistance to effectively investigate, gather and share criminal intelligence to successfully prosecute individuals involved in the illegal movement and criminal use of firearms	The use of the Canadian Integrated Ballistics Information Network (CIBIN) by law enforcement partners and any resulting "hit" for bullets and cartridge cases is an indicator of improved investigations. A CIBIN hit provides a link discovered between two crimes and between a firearm and a crime that were previously suspected to be related. As of March 31, 2013 there have been 31,014 calls for CIBIN service across Canada; 64,295 bullets and cartridge cases have been acquired and there have been 3,248 confirmed hits linking 6,496 crimes or firearms to crimes for investigators to pursue. There are between 15 and 20 main users; over 500 different agencies have used CIBIN/IBIS. For the fiscal year period 2012-13, 7,561 bullets and cartridge cases have been acquired and there have been 386 confirmed hits linking 772 crimes or firearms to crimes.

Canada Border Services Agency

Risk Assessment and Intelligence

Contributing activities/programs	Total Allocation (from Start to End Date) ($millions)	Planned Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Actual Spending 2012-13 ($millions)	Expected Results 2012-13	Contributing activity/program results 2012-13
ICCUF	Ongoing	$1.33	$1.48	Valuable criminal intelligence shared in support of firearms crime investigations in the provision of an ongoing network of Regional Intelligence Firearms Liaison Officer (RIFLO) support, in the sharing of information and intelligence to police and law enforcement partners concerning the smuggling and trafficking of firearms, and the provision of a border nexus for these often organized criminal activities.	Seizure of non-restricted, restricted and prohibited firearms at various ports of entry across Canada. Development of intelligence on individuals and businesses suspected of being involved in the cross-border movement of illicit firearms. Provision of intelligence support to Canadian law enforcement agencies in matters relating to the trafficking of firearms. Working with partners, both domestic and international, to strengthen working relationships and the sharing of information and intelligence within appropriate legislative frameworks, such as within the ICCUF initiative partners, and also our bi-national partners: US Department of Homeland Security and the US Customs and Border Protection.

Total Planned Spending for All Federal Partners 2012-13 ($millions)	Total Actual Spending for All Federal Partners 2012-13 ($millions)
$11.373	$13.162

Comments on variances: N/A

Results achieved by non-federal partners: N/A

Contact information:
Supt. Sylvain Berthiaume
Director, Firearms Investigative and Enforcement Services Directorate
RCMP Canadian Firearms Program
73 Leikin Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
Email: Sylvain.Berthiaume@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

The Director General, Procurement and Contracting Branch is accountable for the "promulgation and monitoring of national procurement/contracting policies" which includes all aspects of the Policy on Green Procurement. The RCMP's financial coding system has been modified to allow the tracking and monitoring of all "green" procurement activities including purchases from Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) green consolidated procurement instruments. Procedures have been established to review and vet system data for accuracy of coding and reporting. All procurement policies have been reviewed and updated for relevance including the RCMP's Policy on Green Procurement. In addition, the RCMP committed to the targets as listed in the following tables.

Green Procurement Targets

8.10 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish at least three SMART green procurement targets to reduce environmental impacts.

As of April 1, 2013, the RCMP will utilize green consolidated procurement instruments for 85% of its total dollar value of purchases of laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers.

Performance Measure	Report on Plans and Priorities (RPP)	Departmental Performance Report (DPR)
Target Status	85%	94%
Dollar value of purchases against green consolidated procurement instruments for laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers relative to total dollar value of all purchases for laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers in the baseline year selected (FY 2011-12)
Progress against performance measure in the given fiscal year		94%

Strategies / Comments

This self-selected target is SMART:

1. Specific: Refers to specific type of commodity and purchasing mechanism
2. Measurable: Information available from RCMP financial systems
3. Achievable: Departmental policy mandating use of PWGSC standing offers
4. Relevant: High volume / cost of computer and printer purchases
5. Time-bound: Date established for target implementation and completion

Other Reporting Considerations

1. Scope: All purchases for laptop computers, desktop computers and network printers
2. Processes / reporting requirements: Financial database
3. Roles and responsibilities: Procurement Unit Managers; Manager, Technical Planning Services

As of April 1, 2013, 75% of all RCMP administrative fleet vehicles purchased (subject to availability) will be hybrid vehicles or the most fuel efficient vehicle in its class.

Performance Measure	RPP	DPR
Target Status	75%
Dollar value of purchases for hybrid and/or lowest fuel efficient in class administrative vehicles relative to total dollar value of all purchases of administrative vehicles in the baseline year selected (FY 2012-13)
Progress against performance measure in the given fiscal year		90%

Strategies / Comments

This self-selected target is SMART:

1. Specific: Refers to specific type of commodity and purchasing mechanism
2. Measurable: Information available from RCMP financial systems
3. Achievable: Departmental policy mandating purchase of smaller class vehicles equipped with fuel/pollution reduction technology, e.g., hybrid power
4. Relevant: High environmental cost of vehicles
5. Time-bound: Date established for target implementation and completion

Other Reporting Considerations

1. Scope: All RCMP administrative fleet vehicles
2. Processes / reporting requirements: Financial database
3. Roles and responsibilities: Director, Procurement and Contracting Services; National Manager, Moveable Assets

By March 31, 2013, 85% of all solicitation documents will incorporate environmental clauses.

Performance Measure	RPP	DPR
Target Status	85%	100%
Percentage of solicitation documents that incorporated environmental clauses relative to the total number of solicitation documents	Baseline data not available
Progress against performance measure in the given fiscal year		100%

Strategies / Comments

This self-selected target is SMART:

1. Specific: Type and percentage of documents that will include environmental consideration
2. Measurable: Information available from electronic contracting system and physical files
3. Achievable: HQ Contract Quality Control will integrate an environmental clause in all solicitation templates and promote its use across all regions
4. Relevant: The RCMP issues a significant number of solicitations for the provision of a wide range of goods and services
5. Time-bound: Date established for target implementation and completion

8.11 As of April 1, 2011, each department will establish SMART targets for training, employee performance evaluations, and management processes and controls, as they pertain to procurement decision making.

Training for select employees. As of April 1, 2013, 95% of Materiel Managers and Procurement Personnel will have received green procurement training through the Canada School of Public Service (CSPS) course C215 or in-house equivalent.

Performance Measure	RPP	DPR
Target Status	95%	100%
Number of procurement and materiel management staff with formal green procurement training relative to total number of procurement and materiel management staff
Progress against performance measure in the given fiscal year		100%

Strategies / Comments

This self-selected target is SMART:

1. Specific: Achievement level of 95%, type of employee, and type of training
2. Measurable: Information available from CSPS and in-house HR tracking system
3. Achievable: Departmental policy mandates all procurement and material management employees take green procurement training
4. Relevant: Targets all relevant employees
5. Time-bound: Date established for target implementation and completion

Other Reporting Considerations

1. In-house training used: None - CSPS Course C215 only
2. Reporting requirements: Collect data from CSPS annually; RCMP Procurement and Contracting maintains an up-to-date list of employees who have received or who need training
3. Roles and responsibilities: Director, Procurement Policy

Employee performance evaluations for managers and functional heads of procurement and materiel management.

By March 31, 2013, all Directors of Procurement will have environmental clauses incorporated into their performance evaluations.

Performance Measure	RPP	DPR
Target Status	100%
Percentage of performance evaluations of targeted Directors of Procurement that have environmental clauses relative to that of the total number of Directors of Procurement	Baseline data not available
Progress against performance measure in the given fiscal year		100%

Strategies / Comments

This self-selected target is SMART:

1. Specific: Target precisely identifies the positions that should have environmental clauses incorporated in the performance evaluations
2. Measurable: Number of Directors of Procurement who have an environmental clause in their performance evaluation relative to that of the total number of Directors of Procurement
3. Achievable: Positions have been identified and responsible authority has been identified to ensure clauses are included in the performance evaluations
4. Relevant: Clear accountabilities at the Director level will increase support for green procurement initiatives
5. Time-bound: Date established for target implementation and completion

The data in the following tables cover performance indicators for all of Canada from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013. In June, 2011, the final implementation phase of the Forensic Investigation Process (FIP) was expanded to British Columbia and the Yukon. Performance indicators for this new service delivery are provided in the first table.

CANADA - Forensic Investigative Process (FIP)

Task	SRs Received	SRs Completed	Average TAT (days)	% DD Met	Backlog Footnote 1
Biology (DNA)
Priority	188	189	21	84%	1
Routine	6275	6071	47	47%	272
Firearms
Priority	10	10	17	90%	0
Routine	1407	1378	44	83%	43
NACB
Priority	2	2	19	100%	0
Routine	841	754	94	46%	34
Toxicology
Priority	77	80	17	95%	0
Routine	2641	2602	42	87%	67
Trace Evidence
Priority	11	10	23	90%	1
Routine	322	442	182	28%	31

CANADA - FIP and Non-FIP

Task	SRs Received	SRs Completed
Biology (DNA)
FIP	6463	6260
Non-FIP	0	11
Total	6463	6271
Firearms
FIP	1417	1388
Non-FIP	0	0
Total	1417	1388
NACB
FIP	843	756
Non-FIP	0	2
Total	843	758
Toxicology
FIP	2718	2682
Non-FIP	0	4
Total	2718	2686
Trace Evidence
FIP	333	452
Non-FIP	0	5
Total	333	457

Glossary of Terms

Backlog

Requests for service not completed within the approved performance standard response time for the assigned priority.

Diary Date

The date that Forensic Science and Identification Services (FS&IS) commits to complete the service request.

Priority

A request for service that receives expedited processing based on an evaluation in the Forensic Assessment Centre, through client consultation and using the principles established in the Priority Rating of Operational Files (PROOF) questionnaire.

Routine

All requests for service that are not "Priority" as defined above.

Service Request (SR)

A request for forensic analysis, investigative information, or investigative services that is received by FS&IS. For Biology Services, a request for service is divided into multiple service requests to facilitate internal monitoring of progress.

Turnaround Times (TAT)

The number of calendar days from the generation of the request (exhibit submission received by Evidence Management) to the completion of the request (release date of the report).